Contents Calendar Find Reference
Navigating the Bible
Leviticus Tazria
  Acharey Mot
First Reading, Second Reading, Third Reading, Fourth Reading, Fifth Reading, Sixth Reading, Seventh Reading, Last Reading
First Reading, Second Reading, Third Reading, Fourth Reading, Fifth Reading, Sixth Reading, Seventh Reading, Last Reading


 13:1  13:2
13:2 If a person has a [white] blotch, discoloration or spot on the skin of his body, and it [is suspected] of being a mark of the leprous curse on his skin, he shall be brought to Aaron, or to one of his descendants, who are the priests.
Adam ki-yihyeh ve'or-besaro set o-sapachat o vaheret vehayah ve'or-besaro lenega tsara'at vehuva el-Aharon hakohen o el-achad mibanav hakohanim.


white blotch
  (cf. Saadia) Se'eth in Hebrew. This is a mark of leprosy (see Leviticus 14:56), which is specifically described as being white (13:10,19). According to Talmudic tradition, it is the color of clean white wool (Negaim 1:1; Yad, Tumath Tzaraath 1:2). According to one opinion, it is the color of the membrane of an egg (Rabbi Meir, Negaim 1:1).

According to many sources, the word se'eth comes from the root nasa meaning 'raised' (cf. Genesis 4:7, 49:3). This is because it appears higher than the skin, even though it is not physically higher (Sifra; cf. Gra ad loc.; Yad, Tumath Tzaraath 1:7; Rash, Negaim 1:1; Radak, Sherashim; Chizzkuni; Ralbag). Since the skin is somewhat translucent, an opaque white patch will appear to be raised (see note on bahereth).

According to others, however, a se'eth is an actual swelling or raised spot (Shevuoth 6b; Raavad on Tumath Tzaraath 1:7). It may thus be a sort of white wart or mole (Ibn Janach). The Septuagint translates it as oulie which can denote a 'barleycorn,' hence, possibly, a subcutaneous nodule.

Later, we see that a bahereth can turn out to be a 'se'eth due to a burn' (Leviticus 13:28). It is recognized as a se'eth by the fact that it does not spread. Similarly, in other places where the se'eth is discussed, it is seen as a mark that does not normally spread (Leviticus 13:10, 10, 43), but is declared unclean for other reasons. Nevertheless, however, if a se'eth spreads, it is a sign of uncleanness.

Since se'eth is associated with a burn (Leviticus 13:28), some authorities associate it with a burn of inflammation (Ibn Ezra; Radak, Sherashim; Ibn Janach; cf. Ramban). Some see the Septuagint's translation of oulie as denoting a scar or cicatrix.

  (cf. Saadia). Sapachath in Hebrew. According to Talmudic tradition, this is a secondary type of mark, of a slightly duller white than a se'eth (Shevuoth 6b; Sifra; Radak, Sherashim; Ibn Janach). According to tradition, it is the color of egg membrane (Negaim 1:1; Yad, Tumath Tzaraath 1:2). According to some, it is the color of white wool, brighter than se'eth but duller than bahereth (Rabbi Meir, Negaim 1:1; Tifereth Yisrael ad loc. 1:8).

According to some sources, sapachath denotes a scab (Ibn Ezra), a pustule (Radak, Sherashim), an eruption (Ibn Janach), a birthmark (Ibid.; Septuagint, siemasia in Greek) or a cuticular crust. Although it is seen as a leprous mark (Leviticus 14:56), it is not mentioned elsewhere in this section. The word sapachath, however, is related to mispachath, which is seen as a clean mark (Leviticus 13:6,7,8). Some interpret sapachath as a secondary or external symptom (HaKethav VeHaKabbalah).

  (Saadia). Bahereth in Hebrew. Rashi also translates it as chabarburah, a spot (cf. Jeremiah 13:23), tiar in Old French (tache in Modern French). It is a highly visible spot (Ibn Ezra), that can be seen from a distance. The Septuagint thus translates it as telaugema which means a shiny or bright spot that can be seen from a distance.

The Torah explicitly describes a bahereth as a spot (Leviticus 13:38,39), that is white (Leviticus 13:4) or bright pink (Leviticus 13:19,24). According to Talmudic tradition, it is as white as snow, like Miriam's leprosy (Numbers 12:10; cf. Exodus 4:6; Negaim 1:1; See Sifra 2:2 on Leviticus 13:4; Radak, Sherashim).

The Talmud describes a bahereth as appearing lower than the skin (see Leviticus 13:4; Shevuoth 6b; Sifra, Rashi). This appears to indicate that it is a spot that is more transparent than the surrounding skin, and hence appears deeper (Yerioth Sh'lomo 2:46b; HaKethav VeHaKabbalah).

and it is suspected
  (Chizzkuni). Or, '[combining to] form a leprous mark on his skin' (Sifra, Hirsch). This teaches that the total area of the mark must be as great as a large bean (garis) (Negaim 6:1; Yad, Tumath Tzaraath 1:7). Thus, it must be approximately inch or 2 centimeters in diameter (Darkey Teshuvah 190:40; cf. Yad, Issurey Biyah 9:6; Yoreh Deah 190:5).

leprous curse
  Tzara'ath in Hebrew; lepra in Greek (Septuagint). The 'leprosy' or 'leprous curse' mentioned in the Torah is not Hansen's disease caused by the germ mycobacterium leprae. Rather it was a physical symptom of a spiritual defect, occurring primarily in individuals on a high spiritual level, whose body functions were subject to their spiritual state (cf. Yad, Tumath Tzaraath 16:10). Thus, a gentile having a leprous mark is not unclean (Negaim 3:1), and a bridegroom may delay having it examined (Negaim 3:2). It is seen as resulting from slander (cf. Numbers 12:10).

Copyright © 2000 World ORT
Notice: This computer program is protected by copyright law and international treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this program, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.